Formula Manufacturers: Inventory Control Issues a Recipe for Disaster
By Nancy Phillippi
March 15, 2010
Most formula
manufacturers that I encounter are constantly looking at ways to improve
their inventory costs and reliability. Nothing is worse for them than
having a customer order and/or production ticket ready for staging only to find
that the raw materials are not available. During my review of
business processes for prospects many times the Material Planner/Purchasing
Manager is doing a visual review of the raw materials in the warehouse to verify
inventory quantities to either complete purchase orders or create the production
schedule. They don't trust their 'system' numbers. Raw material
inventory integrity is often one of the biggest problems that I encounter
with prospects.
There could be many reasons why inventory control is such a pervasive problem:
- The use of separate accounting/financial systems for the inventory and
manufacturing systems. Raw materials are ordered on one system and manually
updated in another system.
- The purchase receipts are not completed in a timely and correct manner. Raw
material is received at the wrong cost or wrong quantity. Human error. By the
time the vendor invoice arrives the raw material has been consumed.
- Raw material quantities are purchased on one unit of measure but consumed in
another unit of measure with incorrect conversion methods.
- Quality control is not tracked therefore inferior materials are hitting
production causing production to use more than the formula or batch ticket calls
for. Production is not recording actual.
- Cycle counting is not in place. Physical inventories occur once a year. Once a
year is pretty extreme! Some companies complete this task once a month due to
poor inventory controls.
The majority of the companies I encounter with these problems are using two or
more systems to manage their business. Sometimes one or more of the
business tools is a spreadsheet. I have nothing against spreadsheets as
long as they actually tie back to a database that is driven by real
transactions. One system for accounting and one system for manufacturing
makes no business sense to me. This use of disparate systems can cause
many problems; one being inventory control. If you are selling out of
one system and manufacturing in another how do you know what your demand is for
production? Is someone taking the sales orders and then filling out a
production schedule?
Then someone is updating one system with the finished goods to ship and
invoice… I have to enter vendor invoices into the accounting system to cut
checks, but I am purchasing in another system… Confusing? This
scenario demands a lot of manpower just to function on a day to day basis.
These problems of course point to operational and personnel issues, but they
also point out to the need for an integrated financial and manufacturing system
that is inherently designed to track items 1 – 6 and more. A production
and material planner should not be spending his days looking for raw material in
your warehouse; he should be on the phone getting you the best price available
for the items. He should be able to feel confident that your system data is
accurate and so should you.
The CIS staff have always been straight shooters with us. That is why we work with them. We get the best service from CIS."
- Vice President Finance, Large Member Association